Three figures of classical pragmatism are usually recognized: Charles S. Peirce, William James and John Dewey; however, pragmatism is not restricted to them or to that period and place (late nineteenth century in the United States of North America). Thanks to the impulse given by these three classic pragmatists, among whom it would also be necessary to include thinkers such as Jane Addams, this philosophical tradition has spread to other parts of the world thanks to its great plurality and valuation of experience. This is why pragmatism has not been limited to the discussion of the issues raised by its founders, but has managed to articulate itself with different philosophical aspects and branches of knowledge, such as education, art, semiotics, biology, ethics, politics, logic, ecology or mathematics, among others, and promises to offer us more possibilities of conversation to illuminate our present and future. This issue aims to make visible all these possible conversations and encounters from philosophy with other inter- and transdisciplinary perspectives. Proposals may be related, but not limited, to the following topics:<\/p>\n
\u25cf Under-recognized pragmatist authors<\/p>\n
\u25cf Applications of pragmatism in different fields such as logic, mathematics, epistemology, ethics, politics, gender studies, feminism, education, ecology, theories of cognition, sports, etc.<\/p>\n
\u25cf Contemporary critiques and debates on pragmatism<\/p>\n
\u25cf New interpretations, challenges and perspectives of pragmatism.<\/p>\n
\u25cf Conversations of pragmatism with other philosophical trends or traditions.<\/p>\n
Deadline: August 30th, 2025. Publication date: June 30th, 2026<\/p>\n
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission’s compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.<\/p>\n